Observations

Marketing as an Organizational Structure: Why You Should Design Roles, Not Just Hire People

Your business is growing, and you reach the obvious conclusion: “We need marketing!” The next step also seems obvious: “Let’s hire a good marketer.” You find an energetic specialist who starts doing everything: launching ads, managing social media, writing copy, and organizing events.

The first few months look fine. But then you notice that the results are inconsistent, the strategic tasks are getting lost in the routine, and your “one-person orchestra” is beginning to burn out. Eventually, disappointment arises on both sides.

What went wrong? The mistake was trying to hire someone without first designing a system. You were looking for a “hero” to fill the gap instead of building the structure.

Predictable and scalable marketing is built around clearly defined roles and functions, not irreplaceable individuals. One person can temporarily fill multiple roles, or an external agency can fill a specific role. However, the roles themselves must be designed from the start, like the load-bearing structures of a building. Otherwise, the whole construct becomes chaotic and unstable.

In this article, we present a simple architectural model of modern B2B marketing consisting of four key roles. This model will help you design an effective department, audit your current team, and identify the “gaps” in your organizational structure that are holding back growth.

The problem: a Team as a Set of “Functions,” Not a System

The problem with the “hire people, not roles” approach is that it creates a collection of disconnected “functions,” not a team. First, you realize you need traffic, so you hire a paid media specialist. Then, you realize that ads need design, so you hire a designer. Next, you realize the website needs copy, so you hire a copywriter.

On paper, you have all the necessary specialists. In practice, however, each person works in their own “silo.” The paid media specialist is measured by cost per click. The copywriter is measured by the number of words written, and the designer by the aesthetic quality of images. The designer is measured by the aesthetic quality of the images. None of them share a common goal tied to the company’s revenue. They optimize narrow KPIs rather than the overall business outcome.

Often, the entire structure relies on a single “hero”—the first “one-person orchestra” who manually tries to connect all these functions. This person becomes the main bottleneck.

The most dangerous part of this “functional” approach is that critical yet invisible systemic roles are always overlooked. For example, almost no one hires a marketing operations specialist first. Consequently, there are “creative” and “traffic” roles, but no system or data to evaluate their effectiveness.

Such a department is not a system. It is fragile, inefficient, and utterly unscalable. Losing a single “hero” can cause the entire structure to collapse. To build something reliable, you must first design the architecture.

How to Use This Model: Audit and Action Plan

This model is a practical diagnostic tool, not just a theory. Right now, you can conduct a simple audit of your marketing function. Take a sheet of paper and draw four blocks: “Brain,” “Engine,” “Fuel,” and “Operations.”

Then, write the names of the employees responsible for each function in the corresponding block. Be honest. You will most likely end up with one of three typical scenarios:

  • Scenario One: “The Hero.” Your marketing director’s name appears in all four blocks (or three out of four). They are trying to be the strategist, lead generator, and editor-in-chief all at once. Diagnosis: critical overload of a key employee, lack of focus, and a high risk of burnout.
  • Scenario Two: “Imbalance.” The “Engine” and “Fuel” blocks are filled (e.g., you have a paid media specialist and a copywriter), but the “Brain” and “Operations” blocks are empty. Diagnosis: The team generates a lot of activity but lacks strategy and analytics. Chaotic movement without direction.
  • Scenario Three: “Gaps.” There appear to be people in every block, but no one is specifically responsible for CRM data hygiene (part of “Operations”) or competitor analysis (part of the “Brain”). Diagnosis: Critically important functions are neglected or performed on an ad hoc basis.

This simple test will clearly show you where your biggest bottleneck is. Focus your efforts there. There are several ways to address the gaps: hire new people, train current employees, or engage external partners (agencies) for specific roles, such as strategy or automation.

Transitioning From a Team of People To a System of Roles

Designing roles rather than reactively hiring people allows you to build a stable, predictable, and scalable marketing system. In such a system, processes take precedence over individual contributions, so the departure of a single employee will not cause the entire function to collapse.

Conducting an honest audit of your organizational structure and processes can be challenging. Often, an “inside” perspective is too close to spot obvious problems or correctly prioritize solutions. An external view from experienced “architects” can save months of trial and error.

That’s why we offer a free analysis of your marketing organizational structure. During the session, we will work with you to apply our four-part framework to your company. We’ll help you identify key gaps and bottlenecks, then outline a roadmap for developing a systematic marketing strategy that aligns with your business goals.

Do you need marketing to attract customers and help sales?